The fundamental objective of this workpackage is to illustrate the significant contributions to the improvement of the design flow for embedded systems in the automotive industry that can be brought by the introduction of hybrid system modeling, analysis, synthesis and verification techniques. The overall work is divided in four tasks.
Task 4c.1: Hybrid models
for automotive control
Due to the rich discrete-continuous interactions in automotive mechanical
subsystems, hybrid modelling plays an important role
in WP4c, as witnessed by the significant results obtained during the first
year. Initially devoted mainly to HCCI and GDI engines modelling,
this task has been extended to include spark ignition Multipoint Injection
Engines, fuel consumption and energy management, exhaust after-treatment
systems, powertrains, braking system and vehicle
dynamics. In particular, the partners will focus the activities within this
task on:
Case study 1: Hybrid
modeling of engines.
The Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) combustion engine principle
lacks direct ignition timing control. Since auto-ignition of a homogeneous
mixture is very sensitive to operating conditions, combustion stabilization is
critical and fast cycle -based combustion phasing control is necessary for
reliable operation. The HCCI combustion engine constitutes a very interesting
case study for hybrid system analysis and control, the combustion exhibiting
continuous-time dynamics and the engine operation being periodic and asynchronous.
Effective control achieving robust combustion stabilization can be obtain only
on the basis of a detailed hybrid model of the HCCI engine that describes the
interactions between the discrete and continuous dynamics in the system.
The experience gathered developing this case study will allow the partners to analyze advantages and difficulties encountered in hybrid modelling for automotive applications, provide motivations for new directions in hybrid system modelling techniques and clear indications for their fruitful introduction in industry.
Milestones
M4c.1.1 |
Analysis of hybrid interactions in engines, powertrains and vehicle dynamics |
Month 4 |
M4c.1.2 |
Analysis of injection, ignition and combustion processes in GDI and HCCI engines |
Month 4 |
M4c.1.4 |
Advantages achieved using hybrid modelling with respect to mean-value modelling |
Month 18 |
Deliverables (downloadable from HYCON deliverables repository)
D4c.1.1 |
Hybrid models of automotive powertrains and braking systems |
Month 12 |
D4c.1.2 |
Hybrid models of GDI SI engines suitable for control design |
Month 12 |
D4c.1.3 |
Hybrid models of HCCI engine suitable for control design |
Month 12 |
D4c.1.4 |
Preliminary report on Case study 1: Hybrid modeling of engines |
Month 28 |
D4c.1.5 |
Applicability of hybrid analysis and verification methodologies to automotive models |
Month 30 |
D4c.1.6 |
Mid-term report on Case study 1: Hybrid modeling of engines |
Month 39 |
D4c.1.7 |
Functionalities and limitations of tools for simulations and analysis of hybrid models in automotive appl. |
Month 42 |
D4c.1.8 |
Final report on Case study 1: Hybrid modeling of engines |
Month 48 |
Task 4c.2: Hybrid
control in automotive applications
In the first year, the automotive control task covered a wide range of
applications ranging from engine and vehicle dynamics control to efficient
tail-pipe emission control. The application of hybrid design methodologies to
automotive control problems will be further investigated. Optimal, switching,
discrete-event and multi-rate approaches to controller design will be
considered. In particular, research activities will be directed to
Case study 2: Optimal
and MPC in vehicle dynamics control.
Hybrid MPC is among the most successful approaches to hybrid controller design,
as demonstrated by the many applications reported including several in
automotive. Optimal control problems for discrete-time hybrid systems can be
solved by modelling the hybrid system as a mixed
logical dynamical (MLD) system and solving the MPC control problem by
mixed-integer programming (MIP). For efficient on-line implementation, the MPC
control law can be expressed explicitly as a collection of affine state
feedbacks and of corresponding polyhedral cells in the state space. The
application of hybrid MPC in vehicle dynamics control is investigated
considering both longitudinal dynamics (e.g. adaptive cruise control) and
vertical and lateral dynamics (e.g. suspension control and yaw control).
The resulting hybrid
control algorithms will be compared with the standard ones employed in the
industry in terms of performances, implementation requirements and calibration
complexity. The quality of the proposed hybrid control strategies will be assessed
by experimental results, either obtained using partners’ test bed facilities or
carried out by our industrial partners.
Milestones
M4c.2.1 |
Analysis of event-based and time-triggered actions in multivariable engine control |
Month 6 |
M4c.2.2 |
Identification of the hybrid behaviors in traction and braking control |
Month 6 |
M4c.2.3 |
Performance improvements using hybrid control design methodologies |
Month 18 |
Deliverables (downloadable from HYCON deliverables repository)
D4c.2.1 |
Formulation of hybrid control problems for vehicle dynamics and engine control |
Month 12 |
D4c.2.2 |
Preliminary report on Case study 2: Optimal and MPC in vehicle dynamics control |
Month 24 |
D4c.2.3 |
Industrial feasibility of hybrid control algorithms in automotive applications |
Month 30 |
D4c.2.4 |
Mid-term report on Case study 2: Optimal and MPC in vehicle dynamics control |
Month 36 |
D4c.2.5 |
Functionalities and limitations of tools for hybrid controller design in automotive applications |
Month 42 |
D4c.2.6 |
Final report on Case study 2: Optimal and MPC in automotive control |
Month 48 |
Task 4c.3: Design
methodologies for embedded automotive control systems
Hybrid system analysis techniques allow designers to evaluate both the
performances of the control algorithms at the functional level and the
degradation due to their implementation on hw/sw
platforms. Implementation platform evaluation will be obtained by introducing
in the closed-loop model an abstract representation of the main effects due to
the implementation and by analysing the behaviour for the resulting system. Exploration of the
implementation parameters space will be performed to evaluate the trade-off
between cost of the implementation platform and closed-loop performances.
Combinations of randomized algorithms, formal analysis, and simulations will be
used to sketch the critical scenarios at which the limits of performance of
fault-tolerant controllers are reached. The proposed techniques will be
evaluated in
Case study 3:
Platform-based design of an ECU.
The platform-based design methodology provides concepts and techniques to
achieve an efficient design, aimed at maximizing reuse at each design step and
achieving early verification with abstracted information from possible
implementation platforms. In this context, a platform is a layer of abstraction
that hides the unnecessary details of the underlying implementation and yet
carries enough information about the layers below to prevent design iterations.
Platform-based design has been successfully applied to different domains
including automotive. Abstraction and verification are essential tools for an
effective application of platform-based design. Hybrid system modelling, simulation and verification techniques play
clearly a fundamental role in this respect, since they are instrumental to a
successful application of platform-based design in the development flow for
embedded automotive control systems.
Milestones
M4c.3.1 |
Analysis of the major effects of the implementation on closed-loop performances |
Month 8 |
M4c.3.2 |
Criteria for the evaluation of different implementation platforms |
Month 18 |
M4c.3.3 |
Analysis of requirements for hybrid models in automotive software product lines |
Month 7 |
M4c.3.4 |
Standardisation and research policies: links to AUTOSAR and ARTEMIS |
Month 33 |
Deliverables (downloadable from HYCON deliverables repository)
D4c.3.1 |
Hybrid models representing implementation details of control algorithms |
Month 12 |
D4c.3.2 |
Preliminary report on Case study 3: Platform-based design of ECUs |
Month 24 |
D4c.3.3 |
Randomized algorithms versus sthocastic methods in the platform based design |
Month 30 |
D4c.3.4 |
Mid-term report on Case study 3: Platform-based design of ECUs |
Month 36 |
D4c.3.5 |
Potential impact of hybrid techniques in automotive networked control design |
Month 42 |
D4c.3.6 |
Final report on Case study 3: Platform-based design of ECUs |
Month 48 |
Task 4c.4: Dissemination
activities
Significant efforts will be devoted to dissemination of the results achieved in
this workpackage among the industrial partners.
Effective dissemination will be achieved by involving HYCON full and premium
member automotive companies in the research activities. The second HYCON
workshop on “Automotive applications of hybrid systems”, scheduled in May 2006,
will represent a major occasion for sharing the results and strengthening the
collaborations with industry.
Milestones
M4c.4.1 |
In depth look at the dissemination activities, recommendations for the future |
Month 12 |
M4c.4.2 |
Feedbacks from WP4c-IAB at the HYCON & CEmACS Workshop on Automotive Systems and Control |
Month 21 |
M4c.4.3 |
In depth look at the dissemination activities, recommendations for the future |
Month 18 |
Deliverables (downloadable from HYCON deliverables repository)
D4c.4.1 |
Proc. of the 1st HYCON workshop “Automotive applications of hybrid systems” |
Month 12 |
D4c.4.2 |
Proc. of the HYCON & CEmACS Workshop on Automotive Systems and Control |
Month 21 |
D4c.4.3 |
Projects on automotive applications of hybrid systems and dissemination activities |
Month 24 |
D4c.4.4 |
Projects on automotive applications of hybrid systems and dissemination activities |
Month 39 |